Power Struggle: Vice President's Remarks on Supreme Court Spark Debate on Judicial Overreach

Spread the love

Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar’s recent comments on the Supreme Court’s role in constitutional matters have ignited a debate over judicial overreach and the appropriate limits of judicial power in India.

Examining Judicial Overreach

Dhankhar’s critique centers on the judiciary’s expansive interpretations of the Constitution, particularly through the basic structure doctrine. He argues that such interpretations grant the judiciary undue influence over constitutional amendments, encroaching upon Parliament’s legislative authority.

The Balance of Powers in Question

The Vice President’s remarks highlight the delicate balance between the judiciary’s role in interpreting the Constitution and Parliament’s authority to amend it. Dhankhar advocates for a recalibration of this balance to ensure that neither branch exceeds its constitutional mandate.

Political and Legal Reactions

Political leaders and legal experts have responded to Dhankhar’s statements with varying perspectives. Some support his call for limiting judicial power, while others caution against undermining the judiciary’s independence and its role as a check on legislative actions.

Conclusion

The debate sparked by the Vice President’s remarks underscores the ongoing tension between judicial authority and legislative sovereignty in India. It calls for a thoughtful reconsideration of the principles that govern the relationship between the judiciary and Parliament.